Apply this method to your own part. Send data for a free roadmap.
Get Your Free RoadmapPublic benchmark · Boothroyd Dewhurst (vendor-reported)
40–85%
Fewer Parts, Published Range
38+
Case Studies
Boothroyd Dewhurst, Inc., the DFMA software developer, reports this typical range across 38+ published case studies. This is not a PPS result; your roadmap estimates your own savings.
Source: Boothroyd Dewhurst, Inc., DFMA Case Studies page
Public benchmark · NASA, 2004
3–8x
In Design
21–78x
In Integration And Test
A NASA study found that a requirements error fixed during design costs 3 to 8 times as much as one fixed during requirements, and 21 to 78 times in integration and test (NASA, 2004).
Agency study of NASA and industry systems data. Baseline: the cost of fixing the same error during requirements. Source: NASA JSC, 2004. Not a PPS result.
The public record shows what DFMA can do. What it does for you depends on your constraint, and the assessment tells you.
Build DFMA into a new product from the first concept, with gates, analysis and prototypes along the way.
Design it once, right.
Covers
Concept
Gates
Launch
Find the features and specs that add cost without adding function, then keep the ones your customer values.
Pay only for function.
Covers
Function
Cost
Specs
Cut part count and assembly steps before tooling locks the cost in, with each change checked in analysis.
Fewer parts, lower cost.
Covers
Part Count
Assembly
Cost
What Will I Learn From The DFMA Guide, And Who Is It For?
The DFMA guide is for design, manufacturing and cost engineers who want parts that cost less to build. Many of them know the idea but have never run a full review. They need a method they can use on a real drawing, not a theory of design for manufacturing.
Without a method, reviews turn into opinion. Parts that could be combined stay separate, and tolerances stay tighter than the function needs. The method has a long record. Its roots go back to Geoffrey Boothroyd's research at UMass Amherst, which found that designs with fewer, multifunctional parts cost less. Skipping it leaves that cost in your product.
The download opens with a two-page DFMA Part-Count Worksheet. It asks three questions of every part and scores the design before and after. The 11-page white paper shows why every part you add costs more than its price and why redesign beats relocating production. It covers designing for flow and proving the simpler part still holds. A drawing and a bill of materials are enough to start.
What Happens After I Download The DFMA Guide?
When you request the DFMA worksheet and guide, we email the PDF to the address you enter right away. Check your spam folder if it doesn't arrive within a few minutes. That is all that happens. There is no sales call and no follow-up sequence unless you ask for one.
Many free downloads come with a catch: a call you didn't ask for, weeks of sales emails. US law sets a floor. The FTC says the CAN-SPAM Act requires senders to offer a way to opt out. We add you to our article emails only if you tick that box on the form, and you can unsubscribe in one click.
Our Privacy Policy explains how we use your details. If the guide raises a question about your design, reply to the email or use the contact page. Send the drawings or models you can share. We sign a mutual NDA with you before you share any data. We reply within one business day. The first step is a free assessment that ends with a roadmap.
Where should a team start a DFMA checklist on an existing product?
Start DFMA where the cost is highest and the design is still easy to change. Pick one assembly that ships in volume or keeps causing supplier problems. Gather its drawings, bill of materials and cost breakdown. Then ask three questions of every part, using the worksheet.
Waiting makes the change cost more. Once tooling is cut and stock is built, every redesign carries scrap and requalification. A NASA study of error costs found the cost of a fix climbs at each later phase of a program. A product already in production sits near the costly end of that curve, so pick changes with care.
Parts that answer no to all three questions are candidates to combine or remove. Next, look for features that need special tooling or a second setup, and for tolerances tighter than the function needs. Check each change in analysis before anything is cut. Plan changes around tooling and inventory so savings aren't lost to scrap. Want a second set of eyes? Send us the drawings today.